I didn’t need more reasons to mistrust men’s interpretations or discoveries, however the documentation on my latest project settled some things:
- Recounts from Ancient Greeks and Romans are false because they are deeply biases
- Whomever was portrayed as bad by history could have been, but was probably not that bad or was used as a smoke screen for the real evil ones who we might actually see as the good ones since they wrote the history we learned as children. All the violent civilizations which were portrayed such were attacked by those describing them as violent. I mean, what were they expecting for the reaction to be if they went on killing people?!
- We celebrate evil men for +3000 years. It’s time to stop.
- Women led most social changes or revolutions, which were then taken over by men who fucked up things again
- Dinosaurs weren’t as ugly as men imagined, and probably not as violent either
- Women were better hunters. Women had a better standing in nomad tribes because men knew women could kill them. Males cannot control their violence, females can – see bonobos for proof where females use violence only to uproot male violance from its first signs not giving it any chance to pick up momentum
- Women were never fragile and helpless
- Magic, spirituality and health were the realm of the feminine since forever
The best argument men have against reinterpretations of history, especially before Ancient shit is the lack of conclusive evidence, but this only protects their half assed intepretations which have even less bases.
Tools used by men to control women:
In ancient times, a virgin was an unmarried woman, and not necessarlilly inactive sexually. The amazons were described as virgins while also registered as having sexual relations. Virginity became a tool of control of women’s sexual life due to the pedo Romans who made it law that men should marry girls before puberty to ensure paternity.
Romantic love is a counterfiet feeling which was invented to justify marriage and create a conditioning for women to marry as no sane woman wanted to bother with taking care of a grown man who had nothing to offer.
The physical sensations associated with love are acctually signs of discomfort and even acknowledgments of threat feom the body. Women are socialized to interpret nausia (buterflies in the stomach) and other threat response from the body ( such as flushness of skin – an increased bloodflow meant to help one run the fuck away) as signs of liking someone. That’s why so many women end up in some sort of abusive relations or they pick the wrong men. The body always knew, but we were told to interpret the signs opposite of what they were.
Flipping the interpretation is an ancient technique of asserting control over the narrative. See Persian and Hindu religions.
In Neolithic, white was the color of death as it was the color of bones and black the color of fertility as the color of soil. I interpret red as the color of life for the blood. Those were the most used colors in paintings. Yellow could also be easily achieved, but was rarely used.
“The scientific method is an empirical method for acquiring knowledge through careful observation, rigorous skepticism [if the statement was counter to men’s interests], hypothesis testing [insert how many studies have forged results], and experimental validation [made in specific conditions controlled by men].” It was developped in the 17th century to validate the bulshit men said and invalidate anything which contradicted their view. I’ve heard so much “there is no scientific proof” for this or that interpretation that it made me sick. And from feminists. Yet, applying tools used to opress us to hold that same narative. Good job, my women! Keep it up!
Let’s get scientific, shall we?
Jesus, Buddha and Krishna left nothing written by their own hand. Therefore, we have no idea what they said, only what other people said they said (assuming we believe they trully existed). So you can stop quoting them. Furthermore, Buddha was against written knowledge which is supported by the fact that Pali is a strictly vocal language, which had to be adjusted to be written down some 2000 years or so after Buddha. Imagine how much the sutas changened in this time + the adjustment from non written to written language. They decided to write the sutas down as they couldn’t agree on the right version anymore. What a surprise! Same for Jesus where mostly we know what Paul the Apostle said Jesus said.
“The main sources of information on Paul’s life and works are Paul’s letters and the Acts of the Apostles in the New Testament. ” So basically, no coraboration from anyone else.
Basically, Jesus, Buddha and Krishna are all fantasy characters as far as scientific proof is concerned.
Allegedly, Moses wrote something down, but we only have stories written way after the fact about it, so more fairy tales.
Those stories are believed as facts because they are said by men, while women’s stories are treated as fairy tales and not taken serious. If you are a Sapphic person and you do that, ask yourself why?
If women’s stories would be given the same credibility as men’s, what else can be true? 🙏
The joy of creating 